Microsoft Business Applications
Deployed isn’t the same as working.
Most organisations have invested heavily in Microsoft’s business application stack. Very few are getting the productivity, automation, and collaboration value that investment was supposed to deliver. The gap is almost never the technology. It’s the programme around it, and the people running it.
How we help.
Specialist Talent
Business application programmes need specialists who understand both the technical configuration and the organisational change that determines whether it sticks. We place across the full stack: Power Platform developers and architects, M365 engineers, migration specialists, adoption leads, governance designers, and CoE builders. People who bring both dimensions, because one without the other rarely delivers.
Delivery Teams
Large-scale application rollouts and automation programmes are complex, multi-workstream engagements. We build delivery teams that cover the full scope: technical configuration, migration, automation delivery, change management, and adoption. Structured to maintain pace and quality across every workstream simultaneously.
Outcome-led Engagements
When adoption rates, process efficiency, and genuine business change are the measures of success, not the deployment checklist, we take end-to-end ownership. Nine manual processes automated in 12 weeks. 14,000 hours saved annually. Teams environments that people actually use. We measure success in outcomes returned to the business, not features shipped.
The investment has been made. The licences are live. Most of the potential is still sitting on the table.
Teams is open on every desktop, but communication still happens by email. Power Platform has been deployed, but the flows break under scale because governance was never designed in. SharePoint is live, but nobody can find anything. The technology is there. The programme that was supposed to change behaviour wasn’t strong enough to do it.
The failure mode is consistent and well understood: technical deployment without the adoption, governance, and change management that makes it land. The result is a business that’s sceptical about the next programme before it’s even started, and a platform that creates technical debt faster than it creates value.
We place specialists who understand why this happens and know how to prevent it. And when you need someone to own the whole programme, we do that too.
Why djr.
Deploying the platform is the easy part. Getting an organisation to actually work differently is the hard part. We hire for both.
Both sides of the equation
Technical configuration and human adoption. We assess for both because the specialists who deliver lasting programmes understand both. An engineer who doesn’t understand adoption delivers infrastructure. We’re looking for the ones who deliver change.
Governance designed in, not retrofitted
The difference between an automation that works and one that creates technical debt is governance, designed in from day one. The difference between an M365 deployment that sticks and one that gets quietly abandoned is adoption strategy. We assess for both because they’re the clearest signal of someone who’s actually done this before.
The full application stack, properly understood
Power Apps, Power Automate, Power BI, Copilot Studio, Dataverse, Teams, SharePoint, Viva, Dynamics 365. We understand the breadth of the platform and the specific expertise each workload requires. We don’t treat it as a single skill, because it isn’t. Treating it that way is how you end up with the wrong person in a critical role.
Let’s talk.
Whether you’re trying to get more from an existing deployment, running an automation programme, or planning a large-scale rollout, we’ll give you a direct view on what’s possible and how to resource it.